He explicitly separates conversion efficiency from the energy put into the system. The high efficiency figures he mentions come from theoretical papers. I'd keep those labeled as projections when comparing designs.

Shaw also points to embarrassment after the fraud. Calling the victims stupid makes disclosure harder. I'd rather hear exactly how the request was made and what made it credible.

Houser qualifies it as a probable outcome. His comment gives us his view of the production constraints. It leaves the staffing question open.

He says he learned that reservation from Javier Mendez, after asking him to corner a fighter whose preparation Mendez hadn't seen. Khabib describes understanding the objection better once he became a coach.

He also describes citizenship expanding before 212. That makes the edict part of a longer process. I'd want to know what changed immediately for people who'd previously held only local citizenship.

He pairs that political objective with the difficulty of moving Union armies across a vast territory. The population and economic totals alone leave those military tasks unexplained.

He treats theory as part of the ear training. Naming what you're hearing gives you a way to describe it afterward. I'd want exercises that connect the sound to the term.

He connects FFV1's development to archivists needing lossless encoding and resilience. Those are separate requirements in his account: preserving the original information and limiting the effect of later damage.

Lincoln presents the result as consistent with ordinary gravity, with better measurements still needed. That's the relevant qualification to preserve when retelling his example.

He also describes changes in gene expression. Keeping the DNA sequence intact still leaves a lot that can change in what a cell does. I'd keep that distinction explicit.