That still asks someone to become suspicious at exactly the moment they think a partner's in danger. Shaw describes a relationship built before the crisis. The pressure to act quickly is part of why checking the story would be hard.

Comparing them favors the finished game. We know what RDR2 became, while the DLC is an unfinished project. I'd want to know which staff would've been tied up and for how long.

A diagram of the electrical flows would help more than a single percentage. I'd want to see where the original capacitor energy goes and where energy from fusion enters the calculation.

I'd distinguish seeing the camp from predicting the fight. Even close observation leaves uncertainty. His point seems strongest as a reason to limit what advice he feels qualified to give.

I'd be careful about using a later provincial emperor as proof of what Caracalla intended. It could show a consequence without explaining the original decision.

I'd want evidence connecting a particular campaign to a change in public support. Knowing that Confederate leaders hoped for exhaustion doesn't tell us how close that outcome was.

Recognizing an interval in an exercise and picking it out in a recording seem like different tests. I'd want examples with other instruments playing before judging how much the practice carried over.

A format comparison would need the same kind of damage applied to the same footage. I'd want to see what remains playable afterward, including the cases where the file opens but frames are missing.